As can happen, one artist draws a cover, and the editor chooses to have it redrawn by another artist. Case in point the cover for Batman 210, March 1969. The layout had been done by Carmine Infantino and passed on to Irv Novick who was enjoying his early years of drawing super-heroes for DC, which included Batman and The Flash.
For reasons unknown to us, DC decided to have to cover redrawn by Neal Adams, an artist who was beginning to reimagine super-heroes in American comics. This was only the third time he’d done a Batman cover.
Both of them are presented here for comparison. Fashion watchers do the “Who wore it better?” thing, so this is “Who drew it better?” Comments – as ever – are welcome.
As published.
IRV NOVICK
Scan from Heritage Auctions. That’s a rubber cement stain covering most of the art.
Art restored and trade dress re-created. The word balloon lettering and the headline were hand-drawn elements by Gaspar Saladino.
Colour version 1.
Colour version 2.
NEAL ADAMS
Scan from Heritage Auctions.
Art cleaned up and trade dress re-created. The word balloon lettering and the headline were hand-drawn elements by Gaspar Saladino.
Colour version 1.
Colour version 2.
WHO DREW IT BETTER?
Scans from Heritage Auctions.
Colour.
Related
Batman No. 255 Cover by Neal Adams
Neal Adams' illustration for Batman No. 255 never got the full cover treatment it deserved. New layout and colour by Scott Dutton / Catspaw Dynamics.
Batman No. 234 Cover by Neal Adams
Two-Face makes his first Bronze-Age appearance. Cover art re-creation by Jovi Neri. Packaged and coloured by Scott Dutton / Catspaw Dynamics.
Batman No. 251 Cover by Neal Adams
The Joker's Five-Way Revenge revitalised the Clown Prince of Crime, even as Neal Adams' time at DC was coming to a close. New colour by Scott Dutton.
A Batman Cover That Was Never a Batman Cover by Jim Aparo
Finding a little-known piece by a comics master is always a score. Colour and cover formatting by Scott Dutton/Catspaw Dynamics.
When you say “DC”, it was really Infantino’s decision. He pushed Adams to the forefront, over Schwartz’s objections, on Batman. His Bat figure is obviously superior, without Novick’s inverted “V” of a mouth.
I prefer Mr. Adams’ cover. He appears to strain more in the ropes and his expression back at Catwoman is better.
I can’t get past Batman’s huge noggin and misshapen hand Adams drew. Novick’s female characters are also superior and more lively and dimensional.
Adams was obviously still figuring things out.
I like Adams’ work better for its dynamism, but Irv Novick’s anatomy is better here. Compare Batman’s left leg on both, the placement of the foot on Adams’ drawing is wrong.
DEFINITELY agree with those who dig the Adams cover the most. “Tom Tom” brought up what he calls the “misshapen hand” on the Adams cover, but to me — and others, apparently — it translates as straining at the bonds. Either way, if one looks at the same hand drawn by Novick (in his early years), it seems outsized, beyond the usual (because hands are often drawn, or sculpted, larger than normal due to perspective, etc). Also: the women draw by Adams are far superior (sorry, Tom Tom), as is Batman. More depth, more “3D”-like texture.